‘We can’t eat a new road’: Fears over the true cost of Exxon’s oil bonanza in Guyana


This story was initially released by The Guardian and is recreated here as part of the Climate Desk partnership.

Anette Arjoon is not anti-oil. The marine conservationist calls the huge new oil fields off Guyana’s coast a “blessing” that will make billions of dollars for one of the poorest nations in the Caribbean, even as she acknowledges that pulling yet more nonrenewable fuel source from the ground will deepen the environment crisis.

But Arjoon does have a issue with who is drilling the oil. She has actually seen firsthand what takes place when the United States’ biggest petroleum business comes down on a little nation bearing the pledge of riches.

As ExxonMobil started drilling a huge oilfield offshore 2 years back, the Guyanese federal government called in the Amerindian marine conservationist to assist display the ecological effect of what is anticipated to end up being the business’s greatest source of petroleum by 2025, exceeding even its wells stretched throughout Texas.

Arjoon, who leads the Guyana Marine Conservation Society, was not amazed. In time she grew to think that Exxon was indifferent to the risks of an oil spill to the coast and rivers of one of the finest maintained parts of the Amazon biome, and of misguiding her about its preparations to handle such a catastrophe. She discovered the business’s habits “thuggish and disrespectful.”

“I can only judge Exxon by my direct and deeply personal relationship with them so far. They are not an honorable company,” Arjoon states.

Suspicion about the oil company does not stop with ecologists. Guyanese political leaders have actually implicated Exxon of fleecing the nation of billions of dollars by bouncing an ill-experienced federal government into a agreement that pays far less than other nations make from their oil.

Then there is the pushing concern of the future of the world. With Guyana significantly threatened by increasing water level, Arjoon is mindful of the effect of Exxon opening a substantial oilfield at a time when federal governments are being cautioned there can be no new oil or gas fields or coal mines if the world is to reach net absolutely no by 2050.

Fishing boats docked at Liliendaal, Georgetown. Some fishers say vibrations from oil exploration are driving away the fish and shrimp.
Fishing boats docked at Liliendaal, Georgetown. Some fishers state vibrations from oil expedition are repeling the fish and shrimp.
Fidal Bassier / The Guardian

Liza-1 task, in the respected Greater Liza location, was the very first phase to start production, with Liza-2 beginning line this year. The Greater Turbot discovery was revealed in 2017, however is still not yet in production. Both locations are determined in research study to be released this month into the world’s greatest so-called carbon bombs – enormous nonrenewable fuel source tasks that would each outcome in a minimum of one billion lots of co2 emissions over their life times. Together they would contribute more than 2.1 billion lots of CO2 emissions over the course of the task, according to the research study, which determines 195 comparable oil and gas mega advancements around the world. The Center for International Environmental Law has actually likewise cautioned Exxon’s drilling and gas flaring “may turn Guyana from carbon sink to carbon bomb.”

Yet for all that, Arjoon is thankful to see the oil streaming because today, she states, Guyana does not have any other method forward. “As an environmentalist with 35 years of experience in coastal communities through the length and breadth of Guyana, I see extreme poverty. Oil gives us a way out of that.”

This drilling bonanza guarantees to make Guyana approximately $150 billion over the life of the oilfields, approximated at 30 years. For excellent or ill, that represents a substantial modification in fortune for a nation of 800,000 individuals, where more than 40 percent live listed below the hardship line of $5.50 a day.

“All of those that have exploited their oil resources to develop their countries should not be telling Guyana ‘leave your oil in the ground’,” Arjoon states.

“Norway is always used as the best example of a nation that utilizes oil, and it is said that they have the best model for natural resources. So why should Guyana be any different? Who is to say that little Guyana, which has been blessed with so much abundant resources including oil, should not take advantage?”

Others concur. There is a bittersweet sense that Guyana requires to rush and get the oil out of the ground if it does not wish to miss out on the nonrenewable fuel source celebration.


After years of stopped working efforts, Exxon made one of the greatest overseas crude discoveries of current times when it struck oil off Guyana’s coast in 2015. Four years later on, the then president, David Granger, proclaimed a public vacation, National Petroleum Day, to commemorate the initially oil streaming from its wells. “Guyana’s future is brighter with the beginning of first oil,” he stated in a speech to the country. “The good life for everyone beckons.”

The federal government assured to establish a sovereign wealth fund, comparable to Norway’s, to change the nation with financial investments in roadways, education, and health centers. Fossil fuel cash is likewise being allocated to establish renewable resource sources such as solar and hydroelectric for when the oil goes out, a paradox not lost on Arjoon and others. There has actually even been talk of a $5,000 money handout to every resident, a little fortune for numerous Guyanese.

Yet the hopes pinned on oil are tempered by Guyana’s dissentious politics, formed by stress in between the descendants of oppressed Africans and Indian indentured workers, and issues about main corruption.

For some Guyanese, their very first encounters with Exxon have actually left them doubtful of the guarantees. A brief drive east of the capital, Georgetown, George Jagmohan utilized to run 7 fishing boats. He may be less upset about offering them off one by one given that the oil drilling started if he thought in the statements of a golden dawn for Guyana.

George Jagmohan sitting in front of a few boats.
George Jagmohan: ‘People aren’t foolish. I’ve been fishing for 40 years and it’s not resembled this prior to.
Fidal Bassier / The Guardian

“Since the drilling started, the fish have gone. It’s the blasting and vibrations,” states Jagmohan, resting on a sea wall beside a clutch of idle boats. “In another couple of years it will be finished. It never used to happen. People aren’t stupid. I’ve been fishing for 40 years and it’s not been like this before.”

A couple of miles even more up the coast, Steve Outar states his catches are down by about 80 percent however he has actually not laid up any of his 4 boats due to the fact that he feels a duty to the teams.

“The fish production in neighboring Suriname and Venezuela is still 100 percent, so why is it falling here? Because the vibrations are driving the fish and shrimp away. Some of my boats spend 18 days at sea but still don’t catch enough fish,” he states as he cleans up red snapper all set for processing as dried fish for delivery to China.

“Each boat has a captain and six men. That’s 28 crew, and each of the crew has a family to support. If they don’t catch, they get nothing. If we’re out of business, they are out of bread.”

Arjoon states overfishing and other aspects have actually played a part in the decrease, however she concurs that “the massive seismics that were done in the early stages did have an impact on marine life, especially marine mammals. That was when you had an unprecedented amount of strandings of sperm whales.”

But she states that when she attempted to talk with Exxon about the timings of seismic surges, to see if they accompanied the stranding of whales, she was fobbed off.

And, like others, Arjoon fears insufficient has actually been done in case of a spill that might ravage this coast. “Exxon’s modeling showed an unmitigated spill could impact the north-western part of the Shell beach protected area all the way to the Orinoco delta. What lies in between is a very special place, especially because that is where the largest national repository of blue carbon exists, at a time when our low-carbon development strategy has been expanded,” she states.

Vessels carrying supplies for an offshore oil platform operated by ExxonMobil at a wharf on the Demerara River, south of Georgetown.
Vessels bring materials for an overseas oil platform run by ExxonMobil at a wharf on the Demerara River, south of Georgetown. Luc Cohen / Reuters through The Guardian

The federal government states there is no proof Exxon is accountable for lowered catches and notes that Guyana’s general fish production has actually increased by more than 10 percent from 2020, and exports for the fisheries sector have actually exceeded $4 billion Guyanese dollars. And Exxon stated its “first priority for every project is to put in place mitigations and processes that help to prevent adverse events by utilizing the best technologies, equipment and people in our operations.”

“The Bank of Guyana summarizes landing quantities in their annual reports on Guyana’s sector economies; according to the data provided in those reports, fluctuations in the quantity of finfish and shrimp landings have been observed for many years. Oil and gas activities have not been included as potential factors.”

“We work diligently to avoid any spills. But should one occur, we are prepared to mitigate and resolve it as quickly and comprehensively as possible,” the business mentions.

But Outar waves away authorities’ claims, stating that is not the experience of regional fishers. And he does not have much faith that the guarantees produced oil will offset the decrease in fishing. “Oil isn’t going to help. It can make the country rich but the people won’t be better off. We’ve still got to live day to day. We can’t eat a new road,” he states.

Jahmohan is blunter. “Are you fucking crazy or what? It will all end up in the politicians’ pockets. They’ll be sitting there drinking champagne and whisky,” he states. “They told us oil will make us rich. We’ve got gold, diamonds, sugar in this country. We should be rich from that but we’re not. So why will oil be different?”

Those issues are more commonly shared. Frederick Collins, the head of the anti-corruption company Transparency International Guyana, cautioned that oil “can end up being more of curse than a blessing.” He indicate the habits of huge oil in the Niger delta, where millions of individuals live with flaring and spills however see couple of advantages.

Others seek to the experience of Equatorial Guinea, which took pleasure in an oil bonanza that in less than a years changed it from one of the world’s poorest nations to the greatest per capita earnings in Africa by 2008. But Human Rights Watch explains Equatorial Guinea’s oil wealth as “squandered and stolen” by the federal government, resulting in decreases in health care and access to education.

Vincent Adams, the previous head of Guyana’s Environmental Protection Agency, states that need to act as a cautioning to Guyana as payments to its oil fund skyrocket to almost one billion dollars this year, allowing the federal government to increase its spending plan by 44 percent.

“It’s not about the oil, it’s about how you govern the country and how you govern the management of the oil industry. Oil is not going to be around for more than maybe 30 years. So the governance part of it is to make sure that we invest now so there will be a sustainable economy after oil is gone to attract foreign direct investment, to lay the groundwork in education, infrastructure, national security, health, agriculture,” he states.

“We are definitely not prepared for it. And the biggest frustration is that the government just does not understand what it takes to be prepared, and what it takes to govern under these circumstances to make the country a better country.”

Confidence has actually likewise been damaged by the commonly held belief that Exxon bounced a federal government doing not have in proficiency and desperate for cash into a agreement that serves the nation terribly, with the international human rights group Global Witness estimating that Guyana will make about $50 billion less than it would have done under a more typical type of arrangement.

A Guardian/Floodlight examination in 2015 discovered serious issue amongst specialists about the agreement signed by the Guyanese federal government. Adams stated he cautioned the federal government versus the agreement however it hesitated Exxon would leave.

The offer permits Exxon to subtract approximately 75 percent of the incomes from its Guyanese wells as expenses prior to the balance is divided in between the federal government and the business. It just recently provided Guyana with a costs of more than $9 billion for those expenses, which the federal government confesses does not have the resources to investigate.

The workplaces of Guyana’s president and natural deposits minister did not react to ask for an interview.

According to Exxon, “the terms of the contracts are competitive with other agreements signed in countries at a similar resource-development phase.” It included: “Guyana’s resources have been brought on line at a record pace for the industry, resulting in significant financial benefits for the government and its industry partners.”

The task, after all, is steaming ahead. Guyana’s vice-president, Bharrat Jagdeo, played a leading function in establishing a low-carbon method and securing the jungle however is promoting as much oil as quickly as possible, informing a current conference: “Because there is this climate change imperative to decarbonise, our policy is to get as much oil out of the ground as quickly as possible. It sounds a bit harsh for those who think you should be environmentally sound, but that is the reality of it.”

Arjoon will be seeing carefully. She calls the space in between Exxon’s claims to focus on environmental management and the reality a “disgraceful deficit,” including: “I am not uninformed that Exxon is here to make sure the finest go back to their investors.

“Exxon is not here because they care about Guyana. But that does not mean they can treat us as an uneducated nation. We don’t drink the Kool-Aid so easily.”

This story was initially released by Livescience.Tech with the heading ‘We can’t eat a new roadway’: Fears over the true cost of Exxon’s oil bonanza in Guyana on May 21, 2022.

Recommended For You

About the Author: Chris McGreal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.